Gotham JA Miele, Sr, PE Water conservation cleans Long Island Sound, RL Swanson, DJ Tonjes Marine vessels serving New York City, W Goyzueta, J Chen, K Byrnes, R Ferro Line stops avoid bypass in pumping station, F Gallo Pilot biological nutrient removal, B Bodniewicz, K Mahoney Enhanced beach protection 2000, FJ Oliveri, F Loncar, M Ellis Telemetering in New York, S Rozelman, S Aziz Job order contracting, MP Quinn, P Schrayer Operational benefits of celebrating Water Week, RE Adamski, H Einsohn, M Keating, A Lamarche, B Olivieri CSO signage: expanded notification, S Rozelman, P Lutz, F Loncar Brooklyn student wins water prize Executive director's message, P Cerro-Reehil |
Line stops avoid bypass in pumping stationby Frank Gallo, PE
The Manhattan Pumping Station (13th Street), owned and operated by New York City's Department of Environmental Protection, serves about one-third of Manhattan. The station pumps sewage at an average dry-weather flow of 170 MGD and peak capacity of 400 MGD. It serves 4,162 acres of land supporting 446,000 residents and 1.3 million people who work in the drainage area. The drainage area is serviced by 180 miles of sewers and 40 regulators. It includes the neighborhoods of the Upper East Side, Midtown, the Lower East Side, Greenwich Village, and the Financial District. Wastewater enters the pumping station through two 108-inch diameter interceptors. The two flows combine in a junction chamber just outside the pumping station. Flow then enters the forebay area, is separated into four screening channels, and then flows into the wet well. Wastewater from the wet well is drawn by five main sewage pumps into a discharge header. The flow from the main header area is discharged into a surge tank and continues to flow beneath the East River through a tunnel that is 8½-ft in diameter, 7500 ft long, and 300 ft deep. The wastewater is treated at the Newtown Creek Water Pollution Control Plant located in Greenpoint, Brooklyn.
Figure 1 shows the layout of the wet well and the general piping arrangement. Each of the five main sewage pumps is equipped with a 60-inch diameter isolation gate valve on the suction side and a 42-inch air-actuated cone valve on the discharge, which functions as both a check and a gate valve. The main sewage pumps themselves have been in operation since start-up of the station in 1976 and normally require overhaul for the impeller and wear ring replacement after 35,000 hr of operation. The need for a shutdownTo perform required maintenance of the main sewage pumps, the 60-inch isolation gate valve on the pump's suction side must be closed to isolate the pump from the wet well. Main Sewage Pumps Nos. 1 and 2 could not be serviced because the suction gate valves were unable to seal, thus preventing the isolation of these two pumps from the wet well. If maintenance of the pumps was attempted without the capability to isolate the suction line with the valve, wastewater would flood the pumping station. When problems with the suction valves were first identified, it became apparent that the valves had to be replaced. An in-house design to replace the two valves and actuators was initiated. The contract was awarded to Spectraserv of New Jersey for $660,000. To carry out this work, NYCDEP proposed a 96-hr shutdown of the Manhattan Pumping Station to allow replacement of the valves for Pumps Nos. 1 and 2. The shutdown would result in a bypass or direct discharge of wastewater into the Hudson and Lower East Rivers through the numerous combined sewer outfalls which serve the pumping station. NYCDEP began discussions with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) to obtain a permit for the required bypass in early 1996. NYCDEP intended a shutdown of the pumping station in March 1996 to replace the suction valves under the contract at that time, but discussions with NYSDEC were not concluded by the end of March. The valve replacement effort was postponed until the winter of 1997 because bypasses are permitted between October 31st and March 31st only. This schedule limits the potential water quality effects to the time of year when recreational uses are at a minimum. DelaysDiscussions with NYSDEC were resumed in the fall of 1996; however, because of engineering complexities, the planned shutdown did not occur. The 96-hr shutdown was rescheduled and approved by NYSDEC for Saturday, February 15, 1997. It was planned during the Presidents' Day holiday weekend when water use would be reduced; thus, dry weather flows would be lower than usual and bypassing minimized. The shutdown was approved providing no rain was forecast. Notices were published in local Manhattan newspapers informing residents of the planned shutdown and requesting that water conservation practices be followed to limit the dry weather bypass. On Friday afternoon on February 14, hours before the planned shutdown, NYCDEP was informed that the State of New Jersey planned to block the bypass in federal court that night. New Jersey officials were concerned with effects of the bypass on shellfishing beds in Raritan Bay. In response to the concerns of the State of New Jersey and its Governor, NYCDEP agreed to cancel the shutdown and place the planned replacement of the pump valves on hold. The planned bypass received extraordinary political and media attention. The New York City Council's Committee on Environmental Protection conducted a hearing regarding the issue. As a result of the hearing, NYCDEP agreed to examine alternate methods which would minimize the bypass. Alternatives and solutionBased on NYCDEP's commitment to the City Council, alternative repair plans were investigated:
Line-stopping methodThe line stopping method involves welding a stopple fitting around the pipe. This is a tee type of fitting with a flanged connection in the branch of the tee. The following steps implement this solution:
A temporary "sandwich" valve is installed on the
fitting.
A blind flange is installed to secure the completion plug.
As shown in Figure 10, a wet tap and isolation line stop was needed at Location 1 to isolate the 60-inch gate valve for Pump No. 1. An additional problem was apparent in isolating Pump No. 2. As shown in Figure 10, the 42-inch pipe on the discharge side of Pump No. 1 prevented the installation of a line stop in the suction pipe of pump No. 2. This problem was solved by installing an additional line stop at Location 2. With line stops installed at Locations 1 and 2, the 42-inch discharge pipe between these line stops could be temporarily removed, allowing access to the 60-inch suction pipe of Pump No. 2. A line stop was added at Location 3, which allowed for the replacement of the valve of Pump No. 2. ResultsUltrasonic measurements taken on the removed 42-inch pipe section between Locations 1 and 2 revealed that the pipe was excessively worn and in need of replacement. Rather than reinstall the existing segment previously removed, it was decided to install a new 10-ft section of 42-inch pipe.
Faced with the seemingly impossible task of replacing
two 60-inch valves without a shutdown, NYCDEP
engineers researched other industries and found a
suitable technology. Adapting this technology to the
specialized needs of New York City's wastewater treatment
operations has enabled NYCDEP to replace these valves
successfully without bypassing any sewage.
|
|
Home | Masthead | Author's guide | Scholarship fund Executive Director
Editor
Webmaster
To speak with a representative: 315-422-7811 |